> should the patch be removed as well?
Yes. I think so.
Matthias Klose wrote:
should the patch be removed as well?
Kazuhiro Inaoka writes:
Package:gcc-4.1
Version:4.1.1-2
Serverity:wishlist
Tags:patch
The following failure happened when cross-compiling.
if [ -x debian/patches/cross-configure.dpatch ]; then true; else chmod +x
debian/patches/cross-configure.dpatch; fi
if [ -f stamps/02-patch-stamp-cross-configure ]; then \
echo "cross-configure patches already applied."; exit 1; \
fi
DEB_VERSION='4.1.1-2'; export DEB_VERSION; \
debian/patches/cross-configure.dpatch -patch -d
/project/m32r-linux/work/inaoka/debian/gcc-4.1/gcc-4.1_4.1.1-2/gcc-4.1-4.1.1/src
patching file configure.in
Hunk #1 FAILED at 2103.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file configure.in.rej
patching file configure
Hunk #1 FAILED at 4006.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file configure.rej
make: *** [stamps/02-patch-stamp-cross-configure] Error 1
Could you please apply the patch?
I think the cross-configure.dpatch is not needed.
Regards,
Kazuhiro Inaoka
--- ./rules.patch.org 2006-06-06 16:12:00.195581099 +0900
+++ ./rules.patch 2006-06-06 16:08:20.781676720 +0900
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
endif
ifdef DEB_CROSS
- debian_patches += cross-configure cross-include
+ debian_patches += cross-include
endif
debian_patches += link-libs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
