2005/11/19, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Really? I only started using -frepo because my executable had become > bloated, and it seemed to help quite a bit; I'll have to try again > without...
Ok, I tried it without -frepo, and you're absolutely right -- the binary is bigger, but only by 277 bytes! It occurs to me that the the difference might be to various template functions which are defined, but not ever used -- I assume there would be one copy of such functions in the executable without -frepo, but -frepo would avoid compiling them entirely. I don't know the cause of the the bloat behavior which originally induced me to start using -frepo, but it seems to be gone now. Anyway, it still might be a bug in -frepo, but obviously I'm a lot happier. Many thanks for cluing me in about this! -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
