Your message dated Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:29:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291762: gcj-3.4 should depend on libgcj5-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2005 01:25:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 22 17:25:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-24-1-67-127.client.comcast.net (localhost.localdomain)
[24.1.67.127]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CsWVA-0002Ty-00; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:25:16 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1285FA51003E; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:25:08 -0600 (CST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcj-3.4 should depend on libgcj5-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5ubuntu2
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:25:08 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gcj-3.4
Severity: normal
Subject says it all. I installed gcj-3.4 and it gave an error until I installed
libgcj5-dev.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 291762-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2005 20:29:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 08 13:29:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DK06N-0000db-00; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:29:16 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA17697;
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:29:13 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C36AF224;
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:29:12 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 11720-30; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:29:11 +0200 (MEST) 11267
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:29:10 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j38KTAEn022192;
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:29:10 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:29:02 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#291762: gcj-3.4 should depend on libgcj5-dev
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Jerry Haltom writes:
> Hmm. Well, I didn't figure that out on my own.
>
> The error message it gave was really unhelpful... couldn't find
> libgcj.pc. Now that I think about it I understand... but at the time I
> didn't.
>
> Bug can be closed if it doesn't need to be more obvious. =)
ok, closing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
