------- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2004-12-09 03:26 ------- I meant: At this point, it's not safe to use SSA_NAME_VALUE for tmp_4.
Maybe we shouldn't add equivalence of tmp_4 and d_5 in the first place if d_5 is also defined in a PHI node at the same BB. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18694 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
