------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-08-31 15:11 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] nearly all g77 tests fail
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31 >13:18 ------- >Created an attachment (id=7010) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7010&action=view) > --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7010&action=view) >Proposed fix. > >Mark, does it look ok to you? It was bootstrapped/regtested (C,F77) on x86, >SPARC32 and SPARC64. > You're replacing both sizeof(mallocArea_) and sizeof(mallocArea_*) with a size based on sizeof(mallocArea_*) roundup up to the byte-version of BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT. OK, I ssee that mallocArea is itself a pointer, so in both cases the sizes you're replacing are the same. In any case, it looks as though this patch is safe; at worst, we allocate some more memory. Patch OK for 3.4. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17180 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
