On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 12:20:16AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > John Goerzen writes: > > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:41:02PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > > I have some questions: > > > > > > 1. when does the gcc maintainer team plan to release 3.4 to unstable? > > > > > > 2. will gcc-3.4 be included in sarge? > > > > Highly doubtful. > > why? I dont' see a problem to build gcc-3.4 for amd64 only (and maybe > libffi for mips/mipsel). You'll make an unnecessary extra transition > from sarge to sarge+1 with the other architectures, but that doesn't > really hurt.
Well, I don't really see amd64 being in sarge, either. :-)
