------- Additional Comments From Woebbeking at web dot de 2004-03-06 14:19 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Until there is a resolution, I don't see a compelling reason to make a change to > G++, so I've removed the regression tags, and marked this bug as suspended. I'm not sure if my BR #14242 is the same but it compiles on all other compilers I'm using (GCC < 3.4.0, Intel 7 and 8, MSVC 6 - 7.1), and I can't believe that bla(const double&) must be declared or even defined before the definition of foo(). André
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13549 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.