Falk Hueffner wrote: > Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It takes about 2.5G to compile. gcc-snapshot (3.4) is not better. An > > older tree-ssa snapshot I happend to have lying around however only > > takes about 130M, so it's probably a RTL optimizer going haywire. > > Today's 3.4 takes 413M, and today's tree-ssa 283M (the figure I > mentioned first was bogus). 2.95 used 360M, so it's not really a > regression. Also Jan Hubicka told me his current tree (with GCSE > improvements) peaks at 60M for this test case, so I think we can > consider this fixed upstream.
FWIW, I just tried to compile on escher with: $gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 20040125 (prerelease) (Debian) no good. I guess I'll have to wait until 3.4 is uploaded.
