Your message dated Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:07:11 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #223737: libgcj4: regression - NullPointerException detection
broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2003 00:44:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 11 18:44:22 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from salzburg.nitnet.com.br (nat.cesarb.net) [200.157.92.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AUb1D-0006Ts-00; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:18:55 -0600
Received: from cesarb by flower.home.cesarb.net with local (Exim 4.22)
id 1AUb16-0008EK-05; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:18:48 -0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgcj4: regression - NullPointerException detection broken
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:18:47 -0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_11
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_11
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libgcj4
Version: 1:3.3.2-4
Severity: normal
The fix for http://bugs.debian.org/206377 seems to have regressed.
Compile and run the following with a 2.6.0-test11 kernel:
-----cut here-----
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.ObjectOutputStream;
import java.io.OutputStream;
public class testcase {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("1");
foo();
System.out.println("2");
foo();
System.out.println("3");
}
public static void foo() {
try {
bar(null);
} catch (NullPointerException ex) {
}
}
public static void bar(OutputStream outputStream) {
try {
ObjectOutputStream out = new
ObjectOutputStream(outputStream);
} catch (IOException ex) {
}
}
}
-----cut here-----
The expected output is:
1
2
3
The broken output is:
1
2
Segmentation fault
This is causing a segmentation fault here when clicking the "next"
button on iRATE.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux flower 2.6.0-test11-flower-reiserfsxattr #1 Sat Nov 29 19:43:53
BRST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Versions of packages libgcj4 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.2-4 GCC support library
ii libgcj-common 1:3.3.2-4 Java runtime library (common files
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.2-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-16 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 223737-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2003 02:28:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 11 20:28:11 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from salzburg.nitnet.com.br (nat.cesarb.net) [200.157.92.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AUbly-0002qO-00; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:07:18 -0600
Received: from cesarb by flower.home.cesarb.net with local (Exim 4.22)
id 1AUblw-0008Pa-2j
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:07:12 -0200
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:07:11 -0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: #223737: libgcj4: regression - NullPointerException detection
broken
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_11
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=FOOASDF autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_11
X-Spam-Level:
After a quick investigation, found the problem -- it was unblocking the
wrong signal (unblocking FPE when receiving a SEGV). The bug has been
fixed at least three times on the CVS (how many branches does gcc have?)
and unstable's version (3.3.3-0pre0) does not have the bug (probably got
the fix from upstream CVS).
Since it works in unstable (and if I'm right and it got the fix from the
upstream CVS, it's really been fixed), this bug report was bogus; sorry.
--
Cesar Eduardo Barros
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
