PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371
------- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2003-10-31 21:21
-------
These are my m68k patches from the relevant
time frame:
2003-09-03 Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* config.gcc (m68k-*-linux*): Remove definition of LINUX_DEFAULT_ELF.
* config/i370/linux.h (LINUX_DEFAULT_ELF): Remove unconditional
definition and code blocks compiled when not defined.
* config/i386/linux.h (LINUX_DEFAULT_ELF): Likewise.
* config/i386/linux64.h (LINUX_DEFAULT_ELF): Likewise.
* config/sparc/linux.h: (LINUX_DEFAULT_ELF): Likewise.
* config/sparc/linux64.h: (LINUX_DEFAULT_ELF): Likewise.
2003-09-04 Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* config/m68k/m68k.c (m68k_coff_asm_named_section): Restore
deleted function.
* config/m68k/coff.h (M68K_TARGET_COFF): Add flag used to
enable coff-only code in m68k.c.
I've re-read both patches and they seem rather safe, but...
is it possible that the objects produced during stage3 aren't
really ELF files?
There are no other m68k-related patches in the same period.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
