Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:47:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel image now support i486 emulation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 11:49:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 12 05:49:53 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 80-190-52-47.kunde.vdserver.de (seppi.de) [80.190.52.47]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18t4k5-0000ul-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 05:49:53 -0600
Received: from i81pc4.irf.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.74.174])
by seppi.de with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18t4jx-0005EZ-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:49:45 +0100
Subject: libstdc++5-dev has i486 specific asm code
From: Sebastian Wilhelmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization:
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2
Date: 12 Mar 2003 12:49:44 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libstdc++5-dev
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre5
Severity: normal
The file /usr/include/c++/3.2/i386-linux/bits/atomicity.h
has code, which does not work on i386. It needs i486 or above.
Is i386 unsupported by debian?
Personally I haven't found any info regarding this on debian-devel or
in the debian policy, so is there any consensus in dropping i386?
(Note, that I don't have i386 myself, so I hope I didn't get that wrong.)
This bug would make nearly all C++-packages compiled with it unusable on i386.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux i81pc4 2.4.20-k7 #1 Tue Jan 14 00:29:06 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8
Versions of packages libstdc++5-dev depends on:
ii g++-3.2 1:3.2.3-0pre5 The GNU C++ compiler
ii gcc-3.2-base 1:3.2.3-0pre5 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6-dev 2.3.1-14 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii libstdc++5 1:3.2.3-0pre5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184446-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2003 21:52:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 30 16:52:23 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19hyrt-0007po-00; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:52:21 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA13141;
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:47:42 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h6ULlgZ07057;
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:47:42 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:47:42 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel image now support i486 emulation
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_VM
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Closing these reports now. Debian now ships a kernel image
(kernel-image-2.4.21-3-386), which avoids these reports:
* Enabled 486 emulation in 386 flavour.
-- Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 4 Jul 2003 22:19:18 +1000
