PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11459
------- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2003-07-09 05:45 ------- Subject: Re: -stdc=c90 -pedantic -ansi warns about C90's non long-long support when in C99 mode pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu wrote:- > pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Summary|-stdc=c90 -pedantic warns |-stdc=c90 -pedantic -ansi > |about C90's non long-long |warns about C90's non long- > |support when in C99 mode |long support when in C99 > | |mode > > > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu > 2003-07-08 20:11 ------- > The bug report is wrong because with those options, I do not get the warning > but reading > the bug report which is this is forward from, I see that the option -ansi is > there, I do not > know what is should happen when you say '-std=c99 -ansi' or '-ansi -std=c99', > should gcc > put into c89 or c99? Could some else look at this bug and say what should > gcc do? -ansi means -std=c89. Which ever comes later of -ansi and -std=c99 should win; this is the general rule (sadly some exceptions are insisted on). Neil. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
