Your message dated Thu, 15 May 2003 22:32:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#193401: specific dependency on libc6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2003 09:43:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 15 04:43:44 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 80-24-13-86.uc.nombres.ttd.es (khazad.dyndns.org) [80.24.13.86]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19GFH4-0005TU-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 04:43:42 -0500
Received: from aragorn ([192.168.0.3])
by khazad.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19GHfc-0002fP-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 14:17:12 +0200
Received: from rmh by aragorn with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19GFGN-0000Fl-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 11:42:59 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: specific dependency on libc6
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:42:59 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libstdc++5-dev
Version: 1:3.2.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid patch
libstdc++5-dev depends specificaly on libc6, making it uninstallable
on arches that have other soname versions, including alpha, ia64,
i386-gnu, *-freebsd-gnu, *-netbsd
I have set severity to important (instead of serious) because i'm not
sure if release arches alpha and ia64 provide libc6 in their libc6.1
package.
This patch fixes all them:
diff -ur gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9.old/debian/control gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/debian/control
--- gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9.old/debian/control 2003-05-15 11:26:32.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/debian/control 2003-05-15 11:37:37.000000000 +0200
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@
Architecture: any
Section: libdevel
Priority: standard
-Depends: gcc-3.2-base, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.2.3-2), libc6-dev (>= 2.2.5-8),
g++-3.2 (>= 1:3.2.3-2)
+Depends: gcc-3.2-base, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.2.3-2), libc6-dev (>= 2.2.5-8) |
libc6.1-dev (>= 2.2.5-8) | libc0.3-dev (>= 2.2.5-8) | libc1-dev | libc12-dev,
g++-3.2 (>= 1:3.2.3-2)
Conflicts: libg++27-dev, libg++272-dev (<< 2.7.2.8-1), libstdc++2.8-dev,
libg++2.8-dev, libstdc++2.9-dev, libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1-dev, libstdc++2.10-dev
(<< 1:2.95.3-2), libstdc++3.0-dev
Suggests: libstdc++5-doc, stl-manual
Provides: libstdc++-dev
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux aragorn 2.2.22 #1 dl nov 25 21:59:43 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.ISO-8859-1
Versions of packages libstdc++5-dev depends on:
ii g++-3.2 1:3.2.3-2 The GNU C++ compiler
ii gcc-3.2-base 1:3.2.3-2 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6-dev 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3-0pre9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 193401-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2003 20:36:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 15 15:36:49 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19GPT6-0006S1-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 15:36:48 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA08686;
Thu, 15 May 2003 22:32:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h4FKWlQ15554;
Thu, 15 May 2003 22:32:47 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 22:32:47 +0200
To: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#193401: specific dependency on libc6
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-25.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_VM
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Robert Millan writes:
> Package: libstdc++5-dev
> Version: 1:3.2.3-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid patch
>
> libstdc++5-dev depends specificaly on libc6, making it uninstallable
> on arches that have other soname versions, including alpha, ia64,
> i386-gnu, *-freebsd-gnu, *-netbsd
>
> I have set severity to important (instead of serious) because i'm not
> sure if release arches alpha and ia64 provide libc6 in their libc6.1
> package.
>
> This patch fixes all them:
there is nothing to fix. the generated debian/control already takes
care of this.
