Your message dated Thu, 1 May 2003 17:42:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#176081: libgcj.so.3.0.0 has non-PIC static code linked in
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2003 02:43:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 09 20:43:04 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (bromo.msbb.uc.edu) [129.137.3.146]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Wp8S-0005Se-00; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:43:04 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bromo.msbb.uc.edu (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA87213
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:42:22 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:42:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgcj.so.3.0.0 has non-PIC static code linked in
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libgcj3
Version: 3.2.2-0pre3
On debian ppc sid, the /usr/lib/libgcj.so.3.0.0 shared lib
appears to have non-PIC static lib code linked in which is
a violation of debian policy. This probably is a upstream
(non-debian) problem as I see this on the same lib from
Franz Sirl's redhat based gcc 3.2.2 ppc rpms.
This was determined with...
objdump --all-headers /lib/libc-2.3.1.so | grep TEXTREL
TEXTREL 0x0
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 176081-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2003 15:44:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 01 10:44:01 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19BGE4-00073k-00; Thu, 01 May 2003 10:44:00 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA13360
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 1 May 2003 17:42:39 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h41Fgd910535;
Thu, 1 May 2003 17:42:39 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 17:42:39 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#176081: libgcj.so.3.0.0 has non-PIC static code linked in
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-22.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_VM
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Jack Howarth writes:
> This should be fixed upstream now...
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg02409.html
