Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2003 20:15:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#184927: libstdc++2.10: Many Application require
libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2003 18:22:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 15 12:22:00 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mout2.freenet.de [194.97.50.155]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18uGIC-00035j-00; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 12:22:00 -0600
Received: from [194.97.55.148] (helo=mx5.freenet.de)
by mout2.freenet.de with asmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 18uGIA-0007A8-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:21:58 +0100
Received: from b2d3f.pppool.de ([213.7.45.63] helo=athlon)
by mx5.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.12 #2)
id 18uGIA-0000gL-00; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:21:58 +0100
Received: from stefan by athlon with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18uGID-0000um-00; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:22:01 +0100
From: "Stefan J. Betz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libstdc++2.10: Many Application require libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:22:00 +0100
Sender: "Stefan J. Betz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libstdc++2.10
Version: 1:2.95.2-14
Severity: normal
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux athlon 2.4.20 #1 Fre Jan 24 15:40:52 CET 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages libstdc++2.10 depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
I can not use many Application such as Borland JBuilder, because they
will use libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 when i creat a link from this to the
file /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3, they applications will run very
good!
Greetings from Germany
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184927-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2003 19:16:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 15 13:16:01 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zensunni.demon.nl [212.238.195.120] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18uH8T-0004gL-00; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 13:16:01 -0600
Received: from ray by zensunni.demon.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18uH8R-0002EK-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 20:15:59 +0100
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 20:15:59 +0100
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#184927: libstdc++2.10: Many Application require
libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Ray at home
X-System: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable, kernel
2.4.21-pre5-freeswan1.99-evms1.2.1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 19:22:00 +0100, Stefan J. Betz wrote:
> I can not use many Application such as Borland JBuilder, because they will
> use libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
The libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 package in the oldlibs section supplies
usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 .
> when i creat a link from this to the file
> /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3, they applications will run very good!
That's a recipe for creating subtle and not so subtle problems.
In any case, I don't see a bug here - closing this report.
Ray
--
I'm having trouble keeping my clever schemes separate from my sarcasm.
Wally
