Your message dated Thu, 2 Jan 2003 03:31:37 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Unable to reproduce with current gcc-2.95 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2001 10:42:01 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 09 04:42:01 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ims.rz.uni-kiel.de [::ffff:134.245.1.88] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14bKLQ-0004mr-00; Fri, 09 Mar 2001 04:42:00 -0600 Received: from ap031.experimentalphysik.uni-kiel.de by ims.rz.uni-kiel.de with Local-SMTP (PP); Fri, 9 Mar 2001 11:39:36 +0100 Received: from cts by ap031.experimentalphysik.uni-kiel.de with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 14bKKJ-00034N-00; Fri, 09 Mar 2001 11:40:51 +0100 From: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: m68k: does not buid, uses illegal assembler code? X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14 Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 11:40:51 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libgmp3 Version: 3.1.1-2 Severity: important Full log at: http://people.debian.org/~cts/failed_logs/libgmp3_3.1.1-2.dsc_20010308-2328 rm -f .libs/gcdext.lo gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -DOPERATION_gcdext -O3 -c gcdext.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gcdext.lo gcdext.c: In function `__gmpn_gcdext': gcdext.c:700: internal error--unrecognizable insn: (insn 1116 5099 5102 (parallel[ (set (reg:SI 1 %d1) (asm_operands ("add%.l %5,%1 addx%.l %3,%0") ("=d") 0[ (mem:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 14 %a6) (const_int -56 [0xffffffc8])) 0) (reg:SI 1 %d1) (reg:SI 2 %d2) (mem:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 14 %a6) (const_int -12 [0xfffffff4])) 0) ] [ (asm_input:SI ("%0")) (asm_input:SI ("d")) (asm_input:SI ("%1")) (asm_input:SI ("g")) ] ("gcdext.c") 325)) (set (reg:SI 2 %d2) (asm_operands ("add%.l %5,%1 addx%.l %3,%0") ("=&d") 1[ (mem:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 14 %a6) (const_int -56 [0xffffffc8])) 0) (reg:SI 1 %d1) (reg:SI 2 %d2) (mem:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 14 %a6) (const_int -12 [0xfffffff4])) 0) ] [ (asm_input:SI ("%0")) (asm_input:SI ("d")) (asm_input:SI ("%1")) (asm_input:SI ("g")) ] ("gcdext.c") 325)) ] ) -1 (nil) (nil)) make[4]: *** [gcdext.lo] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/cts/libgmp3-3.1.1/mpn' --------------------------------------- Received: (at 89023-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2003 02:32:16 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 01 20:32:15 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Tv9b-00016V-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 20:32:15 -0600 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA11074 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 03:31:38 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h022Vcu01920; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 03:31:38 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 03:31:37 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Unable to reproduce with current gcc-2.95 X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: The file compiles fine with the given flags, so the workaround in libgmp3 for m68k doesn't seem to be necessary anymore. btw, I notice, that the pic files are translated without -fPIC. The configury detects: checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... no