Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:02:18AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Michael Koch writes:
> > > Package: gcj-3.1
> > > Version: 1:3.1-2
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > >
> > > gcj-3.1 should provide /etc/alternatives/javac
> >
> > yes, but only if gcj supports most of javac's options. Please feel
> > free to submit a gcj-wrapper, which can be used as an javac
> > alternative.
>
> Should it really provide javac? Javac is expected to compile to
> bytecode, and gcj doesn't do that.
yes, the wrapper should provide javac, not gcj(1):
-C This option is used to tell gcj to generate bytecode
(.class files) rather than object code.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
