Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would like to get feedback, on which alternative to base the gcc-3.1 > packages: > > a) 3.1 as to be released (without dwarf2 support)
As Redhat has demonstrated in the past, it is highly desirable that the distributed gcc is based on a released gcc as close as possible. If there are serious problems in gcc 3.1-as-released, work with gcc maintainers to fix them in 3.1.1. Regards, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
