Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcj-3.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2000 22:01:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 05 17:01:53 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from andhu.lnk.telstra.net (snufflelufagas.bofh.asn.au) 
[139.130.48.34] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
        id 13LC0t-0005Gi-00; Sat, 05 Aug 2000 17:01:52 -0500
Received: from river.UUCP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by snufflelufagas.bofh.asn.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with UUCP id HAA04628;
        Sun, 6 Aug 2000 07:57:33 +1000
Received: by forest.bofh.asn.au
        via sendmail from stdin
        id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 6 Aug 2000 07:56:54 +1000 (EST) 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 07:56:54 +1000 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcj: `-classpath' fails
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.4
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: gcj
Version: 1:2.95.2-14
Severity: normal

  $ /usr/bin/gcj -classpath /tmp HelloWorld.java 
  jc1: Invalid option `-fclasspath=/tmp'

jc1 does claim to accept `--classpath' (not sure whether path is to be
specified in separate argument or in =PATH form), but not
`-fclasspath=PATH'.

(Incidentally, gcj doesn't document having a `-classpath' flag at all, so
 you might wish to reassign this bug to libgcj0, which uses the flag when
 being compiled.  (Maybe `-classpath' worked on an earlier gcj?)  But I
 suggest that a `-classpath' flag is useful given that it's accepted by
 jdk javac.)

pjm.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux river 2.2.16 #1 Thu Jun 22 23:02:02 EST 2000 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages gcj depends on:
ii  gcc                  2.95.2-14            The GNU C compiler.
ii  java-common          0.2                  Base of all Java packages
ii  libc6                2.1.3-10             GNU C Library: Shared libraries 
and Timezone data
ii  libgcj0-dev          2.95.1-5             Java runtime library for use with 
gcj
ii  libgcj0-dev          2.95.1-5             Java runtime library for use with 
gcj
        ^^^ (Provides virtual package libgcj-dev)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 68632-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2001 21:33:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 16:33:06 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [::ffff:130.149.17.13] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 15EHVB-0000CW-00; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:33:05 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA15811;
        Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5OLV6G27710;
        Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in gcj-3.0
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The bugs in these reports are fixed in gcj-3.0. The final release of
gcc-3.0 (including gcj-3.0) is currently available in the testing
distribution. We plan to remove gcj-2.95 and libgcj-2.95.1 from
testing and unstable.


Reply via email to