Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 02:32:58AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > > > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:34:36PM -0700, Evan Prodromou wrote: > > > > By the way, there -is- a libgcc_s available: > > > > > > > > ---8<--- > > > > evan priss:~/tmp$ find /usr/lib -name *libgcc_s* > > > > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so > > > > ---8<--- > > > > > > > > Suggestions and/or a fix would be lovely. B-) > > > > > > It's a symlink to the wrong thing. I think this was already > > > filed/addressed this morning... the soname changed from .0 to .1 in the > > > current snapshots, in prep for release. > > > > I'll check, but the GCC_SONAME wasn't modified, which is what the link was > > originally based on. I am currently trying to figure out if we can grep > > or awk it out of a file some place rather than hard-coding it in the > > rules scripts... > > Given the way it's set - I really doubt it.
it's hardcoded in gcc/config/t-slibgcc-elf-ver. At least for 3.0.x this should be a non-issue :-) reading the symlink doesn't work, because we need the version number for the control file as well.
