Hi Sean, Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> writes:
> Hello, > > On Thu 19 Sep 2024 at 08:07am -03, David Bremner wrote: > >> I guess I'm generally fine if you (or somebody) are committed to >> debugging any salsaci specific issues. I personally find it pretty >> demotivating to debug in that non-interactive environment. > > Likewise. > > I find salsa ci helpful for working on dgit, but that's because we're > the upstream. I'm sceptical of how useful it might be for Emacs addons > we're packaging. > I feel like Salsa CI was more designed towards testing the Debian packaging instead of upstream code. For example for an Emacs addon, testing is done through dh_elpa_test most of the time which skips upstream Makefile or testing scripts. Also there are repro test, piuparts test, etc. that upstream may not be interested in. But I get David and your points that not all people may think Salsa CI necessary. > -- > Sean Whitton -- Xiyue Deng
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
