Dear Oded, thanks for your mediating approach ;)
Am Mittwoch, 30. März 2011 schrieb Oded Naveh: > I don't understand why would there be an dhcpd on an LTSP? There used to be dhcpd on eth1 (192.168.0.254) to serve thin clients on a separate network. > I believe there should only be one - system wide. > For all I know tjener (what ever that means, I take it for main) has been Tjener is the Norwegian transliteration for "Server" or even "Servant", AFAIK. > serving dhcp for both segments and why should that change? It does provide > some other central services besides LDAP. Regards Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
