-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 01:07:35PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>[Holger Levsen]
>> I wonder if we should upload the very same package from bpo to our
>> archive. To etch-test and then eventually move it to our etch. And
>> if so, should we use a lower version number as in bpo (by adding
>> ~edu.etch+1) or just upload from exactly the same source? It is the
>> same after all.
>
>If it is the exact same package, I suggest we use the same version
>number.  If it is an autobuild binary package, we should use a
>different version number.  In this case, I suggest a lover number like
>the one you propose.

A lover number? Do you refer to your lovers by count?


(sorry, couldn't help it... :-)


  - Jonas

- -- 
Jonas Smedegaard   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://www.jones.dk/~jonas/
IT-guide dr. Jones    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://dr.jones.dk/    +45 40843136
Debian GNU/Linux    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://www.debian.org/
GnuPG(1024D/C02440B8): 9A98 C6EB C098 9ED0 3085  ECA9 9FB0 DB32 C024 40B8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHrxCrn7DbMsAkQLgRAmZLAJ4/BUaGTmWx5xbvn24WU94bM9tFQQCfYA+0
UiftsCcgaK1KmLHNiStX01E=
=UGhg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to