Hi, On Saturday 22 September 2007 20:23, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Holger Levsen wrote: > > replaced? or changed? Andreas, do you have an example how they would look > > like? > > Yes. Try > > apt-get source debian-med > > You can use identical Makefile and debian/rules for debian-edu. Just > try and report any problem.
On a first look I screamed "cdbs", on a second look I see a normal rules file
using debhelper...
I'm not convinced yet, but I acknowledge I need to take a closer look. (Only
looked 2min. so far...)
> > Right. Though I wonder if this shouldnt be done in a branch, so that we
> > can still release r2 with the etch-based version.
> Well, cdd-dev < 0.4 in Etch might be a problem.
So you would first need to upload cdd-dev to our etch and we would need to
approve it.
I guess I definitly prefer to keep a branch. Probably for etch, so that the
development in trunk can go on with more ease.
But personally I think we should keep the build-system for etch the way it is,
and use cdd-dev (if at all, see above (*)) for lenny.
(*) "see above" because I'm not sure yet, how cdbs-like cdd-dev is. If it's
like or similar to cdbs, I _strongly_ object. (And as said, I acknowledge
that I might be completly wrong here. Please prove me wrong.)
regards,
Holger
pgpdQDdBOpniw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
