-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05-02-2005 16:58, Alex Brasetvik wrote:
> The reason why we are considering to switch from Plone[2] is that we > have some issues -- mainly in the workflow -- with Plone today, which > eZ is able to remedy. Was Plone setup on a Woody-based or Sarge-based system? Did it use official Debian packages of zope, or what hacks was done (if using backported packages, which ones and of which date)? If using official Sarge Debian packages, was "zope" used or "zope2.7"? The reason I ask is that parts of the problems experienced with Plone (not described in detail here, but at our meeting in Norway) may be solved by now officially in Sarge. The other half of the problems (localization mess) is possibly due to lack of understanding of our needs at the time of configuration, and thus sub-optimal use of Plone localization tools. I do not say this to offend those initially setting up the Plone-based website, but as a hint that some problems may need redesign, not another CMS engine. I'd be happy to discuss this further if there is an interest in doing so. I'd also be happy to avoid further discussion: please point me to conclusions/summaries of earlier discussions, and explain to me why it is irrelevant to take into account the development done with Plone and Debian integration since then. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er n�r: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCB0pwn7DbMsAkQLgRAg4MAKCFucs0EJw/1Go4Q0/Ar8Lv+5AntwCgjq85 rkkbQ+Vr3/f3G6Yvg7AkuTk= =PK4j -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
