* Bert Freudenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040317 12:18]: > Anyway, this point is moot because I don't see the Squeak License being > modified any time soon.
This is what i have been waiting for for quite a few mails now. thank you. i conclude that proper cource of action is to either - drop squeak - build a installation package which gets the existing squeak packages and installes them, displaying the license and everything. that makes us not distribute the software and gets us out of the sqeak, sorry: squeez. > I don't see any conflicts. But that's maybe just me, being a hacker > instead of a lawyer (and proud of it). we have [email protected] for that. people with bigger/differnt brains are thinking about legal (especially licencing and patent) stuff there.
