* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040316 23:30]: > > > > > > Of course there are licensing issues as a result of all this. > > > > do you have some more insight in this? can you estimate how fast > > this can be resolved? > > > > is the process moving forward at all? in what direction? > > I guess you are mssing my point.
yes, obviously. and vice versa, perhaps? > Why does debian-edu care to be involved? We want good educational software for our kids/endusers. We do prefer free software. > Why do they choose to "do business" with Mr. Kay. well, i think i can speak for the absolut majority of debian-edu that we did not even know of the existance for Mr. Kay until you mentioned him. we took the initiative to push for a license change for squeak because we would like to distribute it. Does that imply doing buissness with him? The point in my mail was that i was hoping for a time estimate of the process to change the squeak license towards a DFSG compatible one. i did not care about disneys past involvement specifically because i concluded from the wiki page in the previous mail that the squeak people were on top of things and some kind of licence changing process was underway. i thought you were watching things more closely and could provide further information
