On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Let me try again. I believe that a dependency like this: > > Depends: package-foo:i386 > > is referring to a specific, concrete, non-virtual package package-foo > and it doesn't make sense to allow this to be satisfied by virtual > packages.
My 'believe' is that in this example: Package: foobar Architecture: amd64 Depends: package-bar that last line is in fact read as: Depends: package-bar:amd64 So it would make sense to handle implicit or explicit specific-arch dependencies equally. Best regards David Kalnischkies -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caaz6_fbmuept3nuucjtucvkw7c8ncsgbp8gnvvir-3uf36v...@mail.gmail.com
