On 2012-02-14 15:28 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Guillem Jover writes:
>
>> This still does not solve the other issues I listed, namely binNMUs
>> have to be performed in lock-step, more complicated transitions /
>> upgrades.
>
> I don't think I see where this is coming from. Are you talking about
> variation in gzip output ? Given the evidence we've seen here, in
> practice I think that is not going to be a problem. Certainly it
> won't demand that binNMUs be performed in lock-step.
Guillem is referring to the need to to keep package versions in sync
across architectures, pretty much a necessity if you permit shared
files.
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871upxcvk4....@turtle.gmx.de
