On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:36:46PM +0200, sean finney wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 02:53:20PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I will try to merge something during next week-end hopefully. Until then I > > would be glad if some people could review Joey's old proposal from > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2008/01/msg00143.html > > to see if there are problems in the approach. > > it might be nice if someone were to review/compare this use case for > dpkg-conffile vs the proposed use case of a dpkg-conffile command from > the conffile-tracking support[1], and see if the two could co-exist.
Even if these commands should not be merged, given the number of "dynamic" configuration files (generated through debconf interactions), it looks much more reasonable to expect a conffile manager for maintainers (ie Joey Hess proposal plus Raphael's) than a whole conffile tracker. The latter could be renamed dpkg-tracker or something. -- Jean-Christophe Dubacq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100407084356.ga22...@oberon.tenebreuse.org
