Felipe Sateler <[email protected]> writes: > Do conffiles have to be regular files? Policy does not seem to be > explicit about this (although I'd be happy to be proven wrong on this), > it seems to just talk about "files".
I don't believe that listing symlinks as conffiles works properly at the moment. See #421344. It doesn't make any sense to list a directory as a conffile. I think that exhausts all the non-regular files that can be in a Debian package. Symlinks as conffiles should ideally work. I think it's just a bug in dpkg that they don't. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
