Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]> writes:
> Twas brillig at 02:05:47 17.10.2009 UTC+02 when [email protected] did gyre
> and gimble:
>
> >> + varbufaddstr(ret, "any ");
> >> +
> >> + varbufaddstr(ret, "diversion of ");
> >> + varbufaddstr(ret, file);
> >> +
> >> + if (divertto) {
> >> + varbufaddstr(ret, " to ");
> >> + varbufaddstr(ret, divertto);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (package && strcmp(package, ":") != 0) {
> >> + varbufaddstr(ret, " by ");
> >> + varbufaddstr(ret, package);
> >> + }
>
> GJ> Hmm, this makes translators work pretty hard. Also carried over from
> GJ> the perl code, but as this is getting rewritten let's get it right.
>
> Is --list supposed to be only human-readable? Then we can change output
> format a bit to make it more localizable (12 similar strings like "local
> diversion of %s to %s by %s", "diversion of %s", "any diversion of %s by
> %s"... are localizable, but insane).
I think some maintainer scripts use --list. But I think they only care
wether there is a diversion. Maybe a --test for testing if something
is already diverted by a previous version and --list for users would
be better.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
