One more thing: the longer this thread gets, the more I think that the
original bug is in fact the inclusion of i-i in dpkg.

dpkg is a large and crucially important package, and that means the
maintainers always have something more urgent to do than fixing i-i.  We
should move it into the info package and make the postinstall code
conditional on info being installed.

-- 
A true pessimist won't be discouraged by a little success.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to