Your message dated Fri, 07 May 2004 02:57:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#203019: dpkg: inconsistant spacing in Setting up lines
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jul 2003 05:10:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 27 00:10:25 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bleep.blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19gdnc-0007o9-00; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 00:10:24 -0500
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id
h6R5ANZM032040
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL);
Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:10:23 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) with ESMTP id
h6R5ANsX013323
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:10:23 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) id h6R5ANhd013321;
Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:10:23 -0700
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:10:23 -0700
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg: inconsistant spacing in Setting up lines
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.20
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.10.10
Severity: minor
When installing packages with dselect, for some packages there is a
blank line after the "Setting up" message, but not for others. I'd
prefer there not be the blank link, but think that being inconsistent
is worse than always putting in the blank line.
Here's an example from today's update:
Unpacking replacement pbuilder ...
Setting up e2fsck-static (1.34-1) ...
Setting up apt-doc (0.5.8) ...
Setting up apt-utils (0.5.8) ...
Setting up autoconf (2.57-6) ...
Setting up libflac4 (1.1.0-7) ...
Setting up sox (12.17.4-6) ...
Setting up tasksel (1.26) ...
Setting up pbuilder (0.77) ...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux quaff 2.4.21q12 #1 Thu Jul 3 18:56:32 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii dselect 1.10.10 a user tool to manage Debian packa
ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 203019-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2004 01:57:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 06 18:57:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [62.49.129.34]
(qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BLuby-0000pA-00; Thu, 06 May 2004 18:57:15 -0700
Received: (qmail 12451 invoked from network); 7 May 2004 01:57:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO syndicate.netsplit.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by populous.netsplit.com with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 7 May 2004 01:57:12
-0000
Subject: Bug#203019: dpkg: inconsistant spacing in Setting up lines
From: Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-JhIzEYZlATlO9WFGCsIG"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5.7
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 02:57:12 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--=-JhIzEYZlATlO9WFGCsIG
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Because these blank lines actually mean something to the expert, this
bug is invalid.
Scott
--=20
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
--=-JhIzEYZlATlO9WFGCsIG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBAmuz4IexP3IStZ2wRAjOvAKCr/faNq2Cxg7TUunoF1PdhEjfF8ACbB0X2
X+sUHnAkDHnAMuldiyprI+I=
=wD5j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-JhIzEYZlATlO9WFGCsIG--
