Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:00:53 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#212489: dselect: says using /var/cache/apt/available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2003 23:40:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 23 18:40:00 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3.apol.com.tw [203.79.224.67]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A1wlD-00053D-00; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:39:59 -0500
Received: from jidanni.org (TC218-187-80-227.2-7.pl.apol.com.tw
[218.187.80.227])
by smtp3.apol.com.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA16144422
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:39:54 +0800 (CST)
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 4.22)
id 1A1wG9-0000lv-C0; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:07:53 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dselect: says using /var/cache/apt/available
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:07:53 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: dselect
Version: 1.10.10
Severity: minor
# dselect update
...
Replacing available packages info, using /var/cache/apt/available.
Huh?
# ls -l /var/cache/apt/available
ls: /var/cache/apt/available: No such file or directory
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 212489-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2003 00:00:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 23 19:00:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from brown.brainfood.com (gradall.private.brainfood.com)
[146.82.138.61]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A1x5V-0000kA-00; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:00:57 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=adam)
by gradall.private.brainfood.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1A1x5R-0007oC-00; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:00:53 -0500
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:00:53 -0500 (CDT)
From: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#212489: dselect: says using /var/cache/apt/available
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: dselect
> Version: 1.10.10
> Severity: minor
>
> # dselect update
> ...
> Replacing available packages info, using /var/cache/apt/available.
That file is a temporary file, created by apt. The temporary file is then
read by dpkg, to update it's database. The temp file is then removed.
Please don't file bugs when you have no clue.
