Your message dated 10 Oct 2002 15:44:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2002 14:12:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 16 09:12:45 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (pangaea.shcorp.com) [67.97.0.82] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 178Lzo-0001Gj-00; Thu, 16 May 2002 09:12:44 -0500
Received: from samerica.shcorp.com (samerica.shcorp.com [10.10.1.234])
        by pangaea.shcorp.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) with ESMTP id 
g4GEC6pq019360;
        Thu, 16 May 2002 10:12:06 -0400
Received: from kyoder by samerica.shcorp.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
        id 178LzC-000565-00; Thu, 16 May 2002 10:12:06 -0400
From: Kurt Yoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: spong-common: can't install package
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 10:12:06 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Kurt Yoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: spong-common
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-16
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

here's what happens:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install spong-common
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  spong-common
  0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 170  not
  upgraded.
  Need to get 0B/133kB of archives. After unpacking 705kB will be used.
  Preconfiguring packages ...
  dpkg-deb: wait for tar failed: No child processes
  dpkg: error processing
  /var/cache/apt/archives/spong-common_2.7.6a-5_all.deb (--unpack):
   subprocess dpkg-deb --control returned error exit status 2
   Errors were encountered while processing:
    /var/cache/apt/archives/spong-common_2.7.6a-5_all.deb
    E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)



-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux samerica 2.4.17-686-smp #2 SMP Sat Dec 22 22:00:42 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 147183-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2002 13:44:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 10 08:44:44 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp02.wxs.nl [195.121.6.54] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 17zdcK-0004gR-00; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:44:44 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([213.75.115.205]) by
          smtp02.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id
          H3RQ5O02.B09 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002
          15:44:12 +0200 
Subject: done
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 10 Oct 2002 15:44:16 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The fact that running tar (on anything) before running dpkg
makes a difference indicates clearly that the problem was
some sort of system flakiness.  

Closing.  Please forgive me and reopen if you now think
that there really is a bug in dpkg.

--
Thomas


Reply via email to