On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:19:55PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > Re: #47267 > > I have a strong suspicion that the fault here lies with the > pam-apps package -- specifically, with its prerm or postrm. > Unfortunately, as pam-apps is obsolete and I can't find a copy > of the package anywhere, I can't confirm my suspicion. > > The hypothesis is that the pam-apps postrm deleted /etc/pam.d/su > on remove or purge. Other packages' postrms have been caught > doing the same (wrong) thing.
You're suspicion is incorrect. Most likely the case is that if pam-apps removed (not purged) and a newer login was installed that replaced /etc/pam.d/su, then latter pam-apps was "purged", removing the config files. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
