On Thu, 16 May 2002, Ian Jackson wrote: > I suggest you add > sincenothing= 0; > to before the two returns near the top of deferred_remove in remove.c, > ie just in between the two occurrences of these two lines: > pkg->clientdata->istobe= itb_normal; > return; > > You should probably add > sincenothing= 0; > to inside the setjmp handler in while (queuelen) in > packages.c:process_queue, too.
These don't make sense. You are suggesting to reset the counter to the start value, when there could be actual real errors that have been detected. > Really, it would be better to do something different to arrange to > definitely only increment sincenothing if the package is put back on > the queue, rather than having to remember in all places where its > processing is stopped *without* putting it back on the queue. This is what I prefer, but don't have time think about it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
