Previously Colin Watson wrote: > Making the hash larger than the number of items it's going to have to > contain does seem like an "obviously correct" optimization though.
Not necessarily since iirc the hash is only used to build the linked lists and not accessed after initialization. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
