Michel Verdier wrote: > [cut] > Everybody knows that .deb are usually the last to be released to increase > stability for .deb packages. When security is an issue .rpm and .deb are > both tested and it would be great to have statistics to know which is the > quicker to be installed and used. > I must say, my subjective experience has been that rpm's are much faster to install something. Of course, it's also faster to throw my clothes on the floor, rather than put them in the hamper...
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info. Craig Sanders
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info. Craig Sanders
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info. Wichert Akkerman
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info. Steve Morocho
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info. Karl M. Hegbloom
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info. Michel Verdier
- Re[2]: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info. Steve Lamb
- Re: Re[2]: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need... Jeremy C. Reed
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info. Josip Rodin
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info. Keith G. Murphy
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info. Wichert Akkerman
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need i... Ethan Benson
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need i... Josip Rodin
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need i... Craig Sanders
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need i... Craig Sanders
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need i... Ethan Benson
- Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need i... Craig Sanders
- Binary pkg cache (WAS: Re: Debian ... Juergen A. Erhard
- Re: Binary pkg cache (WAS: Re: Deb... Joey Hess
- Re: Binary pkg cache (WAS: Re: Deb... Craig Sanders

