Hi! On Tue, 2024-08-13 at 17:33:58 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > El 13/8/24 a las 16:30, Guillem Jover escribió: > > I'm now closing it, because only with the fixed marking is not > > enough for the BTS, and it was being kept open. :) > > Yes, I was aware that "fixed" did not close the bug.
Sorry, yes, I assumed you knew that. I was just stating it explicitly, why I was closing it "for historical record". > To clarify: I was keeping the bug open (but not > in the list of bugs affecting trixie or sid) just > in case you would be willing to do some final > tidy up (merge, affects, etc) before closing. > I usually (but not always) try to do that kind of tidying up, > but I acknowledge that not everybody has the same standards > for that. In particular, merging bugs which are essentially > the same is often tricky and we can live without that. I think doing that in general is ideal, and should perhaps have done that, but I don't think it gave additional insight into the problem, and having it out of the way, seemed better. :) Thanks, Guillem
