Richard Lewis <richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com> writes: > Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> On 22-12-2024 19:08, Richard Lewis wrote: >>> Currently the page has several that relate to bookworm (and some >>> before): should anything relating to bookworm or earlier be closed? is >>> it still desirable/possible to amend the bookworm release-notes? >> >> bookworm release-notes can be updated until bookworm is no longer >> supported by the Release-Team and security support. So, only bugs only >> applicable for bullseye and before should be closed at this stage. > > OK, maybe ill look at some of these -- for the bookworm release-notes, > does that mean a MR against the bookworm branch? (which is still in > docbook format, i assume the support for building docbook is still > there, --- or am i just confused... > > how do i view the different branches? (i cant get either to build > locally) > > (Ill reply to individual bugs, but i seem to be a bit confused by the > git repo at the moment)
I worked it out: bookworm (docbook) is https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ trixie (rst) is https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/release-notes/index.en.html Unfortunately https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/amd64/release-notes/ is a 404, i wonder if someone could make those pages redirect to the correct trixie pages? My remaining question is: will commits to https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/tree/bookworm?ref_type=heads still make it to the bookworm page?
