Hi, Thanks for the reviews.
On 05-08-2021 06:37, Justin B Rye wrote: > Has bullseye added extra providers for mailx? I don't know. I'm not aware of it. > On buster there's > only bsd-mailx and mailutils. Mind you, fail2ban only Suggests > mailx, so maybe it's assuming some more complicated alternative. Indeed, the third binary I can find [1] that adds an alternative to mail is https://sources.debian.org/src/nmh/1.7.1-7/debian/nmh.postinst/?hl=17#L17 >> + use <command>mail</command> from <systemitem >> + role="package">mailutils</systemitem>) just before the release >> + of bullseye broke this functionality for systems that have >> + <command>mail</command> provided by <systemitem >> + role="package">bsd-mailx</systemitem>. Users of >> + <systemitem>fail2ban</systemitem> in combination with > > Don't these need to be <systemitem role="package">? I'm not sure what > <systemitem> on its own does. I *think* the "role" is only needed to get the right link in the index. However, as the same packages are already mentioned in the same paragraph, I *think* it's redundant to add it again. >> + either switch to a different provide for <command>mail</command> > > English fix: typo provider > > (but if there's no other provider, we might as well say "switch > to mailutils") I think there's at least three. > A suggestion for a slightly more detailed version: > > or manually unapply <ulink > > url="https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/commit/410a6ce5c80dd981c22752da034f2529b5eee844";>the > upstream commit</ulink> (which inserted the string > "<literal>-E 'set escape'</literal>" in multiple places under > <filename>/etc/fail2ban/action.d/</filename>). Thanks. Paul [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=--slave.%2Bmail&literal=0&page=3
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
