Hi On 30-07-2021 22:23, Paul Gevers wrote: > Please find attached my proposal how to document the issue with > libgc1c2 upgrades.
To give translators a chance, I have pushed this without review. The attached text is what I pushed. Fixes still welcome of course. Paul
From 41649ab14727defbeb05fec72977bcb8aa1fcee2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:17:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] issues.dbk: libgc1c2 can be hold back
Closes: #988003
---
en/issues.dbk | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/en/issues.dbk b/en/issues.dbk
index bf94155e..4c0faef5 100644
--- a/en/issues.dbk
+++ b/en/issues.dbk
@@ -480,6 +480,19 @@ data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/some/path/$domain_data/aliases}}
</para>
</section>
+ <section id="libgc1">
+ <title>Upgrades involving libgc1c2 need two runs</title>
+ <para>
+ Packages that depend on <systemitem
+ role="package">libgc1c2</systemitem> in buster (e.g. <systemitem
+ role="package">guile-2.2-libs</systemitem>) may be held back
+ during the first full upgrade run to bullseye. Doing a second
+ upgrade normally solves the issue. The background of the issue
+ can be found in <ulink url="&url-bts;988963">bug
+ #988963</ulink>.
+ </para>
+ </section>
+
<section id="before-first-reboot">
<title>Things to do post upgrade before rebooting</title>
<!-- If there is nothing to do -->
--
2.30.2
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
