On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 11:52:42PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:05:39AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On 01-06-2019 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 May 2019 13:00:52 +0100 Justin B Rye > > > <justin.byam....@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Daniel Lange wrote: > > >>>> * reason for removal > > >>>> not essential, but it helps to understand the issue > > >>> #765854 > > >>> ecryptfs cannot unmount encrypted home directories due to systemd > > >>> keeping > > >>> the pam session active even after logout. > > >>> Upstream bug https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8598 > > >>> A work around (user unit file) has not been implemented and tested. > ... > > > In absence of other text, I am about to push the attached text to the > > > release-notes. I hope this isn't the final text, but at least the draft > > > document now mentions the problem. > > > > Did anybody learn about (documented) migration paths in the mean time? > > Unencrypt eCryptfs data and mount the unencrypted filesystem is one way. > > But then we don't have encryption. > > I can think of migration to dm-crypt/LUKS or encfs/FUSE is an technical > possibility. But that's something beyond this document should > elaborate,
LUKS is the only sensible option, overlay file systems, especially encfs are significantly less safe, which was among the reasons we ended up here in the first place. -- debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev ubuntu core developer i speak de, en
