Your message dated Thu, 27 Jun 2019 20:50:06 +0200 with message-id <72daf5cb-f2b1-4581-dad3-4a9a67c7c...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#931130: Document that local configuration for dummy and bonding modules are getting overwritten by systemd has caused the Debian Bug report #931130, regarding Document that local configuration for dummy and bonding modules are getting overwritten by systemd to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 931130: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931130 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release-notes Dear maintainers, Systemd, in buster, will ship the file /lib/modprobe.d/systemd.conf, which contains the following: options bonding max_bonds=0 # Do the same for dummy0. options dummy numdummies=0 This breaks any configuration that an administrator could have added to /etc/modprobe.d regarding the dummy and bonding modules. For instance, a file in /etc/modprobe.d/dummy.conf containing: options dummy numdummies=1 Will result in the following being executed by modprobe: insmod /lib/modules/4.19.0-5-amd64/kernel/drivers/net/dummy.ko numdummies=1 numdummies=0 And the original configuration will be overridden. The only way to force modprobe to use local configuration is to rename the /etc/modprobe.d/dummy.conf file to /etc/modprobe.d/systemd.conf. I thinks this should be documented in the release notes as admins would need to be aware of that. Best, -- Baptiste BEAUPLAT - lyknode
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi, On 27-06-2019 20:02, Justin B Rye wrote: > Justin B Rye wrote: >> Okay, so here's a first rough idea of what the release-notes might >> say. > > Properly formatted patch attached. Pushed that patch to the archive. Thanks. Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---