Baptiste Jammet wrote:
>> In "installing" we have now:
>>
>> The installer and the installed systems use a different
>> naming scheme for network interfaces.
>>
>> I understood it that way, that the Stretch installer and an installed
>> Stretch system don't use the same naming scheme.
>> But that's not what was meant, right?
>
> No, I meant "different from what was used until Jessie".
It doesn't naturally read as "mutually different" for me - that would
have to be "use different naming schemes" (or "each use a different
naming scheme"); but it isn't clear what the scheme *is* different
from.
>> I would propose something like:
>>
>> The installer and the installed systems have changed the
>> naming scheme for network interfaces.
>
> The installer have changed, but the new system "just" get the new
> scheme!
>
>> or
>>
>> The installer and the installed systems use a changed
>> naming scheme for network interfaces.
>
> Or more directly:
> The installer and the installed systems use a new
> naming scheme for network interfaces.
Yes, each of these seems like an improvement.
> l10n-english, do you have a favorite, or another better one?
Perhaps "use a new standard naming scheme", just in case pedants
insist that technically it's been available for years? But it's new
to the installer, so probably don't bother - stick with "use a new
naming scheme".
It's about time I did my first sweep of the release notes.
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
