> Indeed. It would probably be more useful for the LDP to be updated > than to abandon it, if only because it has an easily recognised name. > If there are better sources, the LDP should adopt them, replacing the > outdated ones.
Unfortunately I don't think the LDP in its current form has much of a chance of catching up with anything else. Technical-style guides are simply not the way most users read information. I'd love to see the effort redirected to distribution wikis or even upstream to projects! -- Tom M
