Hi Holger, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:06:54PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb-debian-doc-2016030...@mdcc.cx> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:06:36AM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb-debian-doc-2016030...@mdcc.cx> wrote: > > > 1. > > > I'm trying to get in contact with Osamu since some time, but I get > > > no response. > > > See https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2015/10/msg00114.html > > > and follow-ups for example > > > (hmm, Osamu moved from his parents home some time ago, ... ) > > > > No action from debian-doc is required there, right? (I am sorry, I can only > > help with debian-doc stuff.) > > I'm sometimes unsure about the exact circumstances...
So that's about https://bugs.debian.org/803541 . Osamu wrote: "Bug me if I do not fix this in a month or so." Please ping him again. If it's not debian-www's issue, the bug will get re-assigned to the right package/people. > > > 2. > > > Several months ago I submitted #788361 against debian-faq, but nothing > > > happened yet. I have offered to work on that myself, but got no answer > > > from Javier. > > > See https://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2016/02/msg00001.html > > > (ok, I know Javier is busy ATM). > > > > I believe you're involved in debian faq and other debian documents for > > quite a > > while now, yes? Do you have SVN commit access on the debian faq repo? (I > > believe you should.) > > I have commit access! So I could do the job myself, and I already have > proposed to do so. > And I asked for a confirmation, if it's ok for to do that, and/or if some > additional action is wanted for this, like providing patches before committing > etc. > But I got no answer yet ... Well, as I said, in https://bugs.debian.org/788361 Javier wrote: "I will review". Just ping him about it again. Supplying patches won't harm. Just do it. > > I recently started doing some work on debian faq; if Javier doesn't get to > > it > > soonish (he said he would), I'll deal with that one. Thanks a lot for the > > patch, btw! BTW, in general I feel if you have commit access and some ideas for improvements: please do go ahead & just commit it. In case somebody finds it's not good, it can always get reverted. In wikipedia-country it's called "Be Bold": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Be_bold . I feel in Debian it's just the same. I only now see your 2 messages in https://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2016/02/msg00001.html ; I missed them at the time. I am sorry about that. So, about #788361 : just ping Javier again (Cc-ed.) <snip> > > You can help; actually, you're already doing it :) > > Indeed. And I would like to do more, to make more progress, but that's > mostly not easy. I can only repeat: Be Bold :) Thanks for your interest & work, Bye, Joost -- Are Linux users lemmings collectively jumping off of the cliff of reliable, well-engineered commercial software? --Matt Welsh http://mdcc.cx/ ※ http://ad1810.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
