-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It is much more likely that a normal user will be generating ISO images than ext2 loopback filesystems.
- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter S Galbraith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 4:15 PM Subject: Re: mkfs in /sbin, mkisofs in /usr/bin (was: Re: Intent To Split: netbase > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > There is some inconsistency here. > > > > ulysses:~# which mkisofs > > /usr/bin/mkisofs > > ulysses:~# which mke2fs > > /sbin/mke2fs > > tony mancill wrote: > > > I disagree. You *NEED* to have a copy of mke2fs in the root > > filesystem in case /usr or any other mounted filesystem gets > > whacked. OTOH, you probably won't be mastering any CD images > > while your system is crippled, so having mkisofs in /usr is not > > inconsistent. > > Sure. > > I _think_ Marcus was simply arguing that one command is in a `bin' > directory and the other in an `sbin' directory (regardless of the > `usr' issue). > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBOZ3IAgyJYjpYFEaZEQLkAwCdFUVYHBxRUkzz4AVhz1QOOHLItKwAoM3k EcVzWLf0vTUnRo4e1N4zNnVy =khVi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
